Milan academic failure, as with the

 Milan reviews press

like.

how to examine the quality of work it? Publications to see it published How to measure the To the publication of the articles published in recent years, the number of citations to measure. The last publication grade division found the problem also is that there is a so-called high-end publications 80/20 phenomenon, that 80% of the references tend to be those 20% of the article. A

has come to an end the

1 23, the famous fake people, said Fang, Fudan University Academic Standards Committee has been brought to a new survey of plagiarism cases Zhu Xueqin. Fang, application letter that day posted on his blog, saying Zhu Xueqin plagiarism ignited than before,

2010   3 months, Wang Hui and Zhu Xueqin scholars at leading universities --- alleged plagiarism incident triggered widespread concern. In the event disclosure, Zhu Xueqin initiative to apply for start the investigation procedures, With both Tsinghua University Wang Hui and silent than to win a round of applause from the media. However, the final certified results of Fudan

suspected cases of academic plagiarism, and plagiarism in recent years has been emerging, such as Wuhan University Week suspected plagiarism case, the Great Wall, Peking University, Anthropology of plagiarism cases before the other. Not long ago, the author said Professor Zhu Xueqin with a well-known case. He said that if it also constitutes a Obviously, this phenomenon has been taken for granted within academia.

why so many scholars into the The obvious answer is the latter. Plagiarism is only present in the Chinese system of academic failure as a collective one. Not only plagiarism, ghost, and other papers have been published for sale or even form a complete industrial chain. Wuhan University, a related study found that the mainland market, the trading of forged papers, in 2009 reached 10 billion size.

forced to Academic monographs, theses far behind the rampant plagiarism of academic and moral loss is so simple and apparently the failure of incentive and restraint mechanisms, investment income ratio is a trade-off results. In the current evaluation system of university academic, research published in this part of several monographs, the number of papers. When the Promoted by this crooked ways to promotion than to rely on real skills much easier, as long as the probability of punishment after being held low, crooked road that will prevail.

If a teacher, stick to their academic originality, notes, The results of his appraisal, job promotion in the how and the Because the latter is much lower cost. In this case, participation in academic competitors tend to have three. One fled universities, angrily quit the game; Second, take the initiative to admit defeat, not to compete with the crooked road, willing to be marginalized; third is

under the existing rules of the game, more people chose the third class. This is a cost-benefit ratio, the competitors choose a passive The end result becomes a clever trick or a Competition, the production of knowledge itself barren, the nature of the game is completely changed, genuine talent but nobody cares. Amazing academic achievements, for example, some can escape being a one-year exposure produced seven books, only that such a crooked trick is how to channel the rampant madness. In fact, the overall bottom line of academic and moral decay, not the causes of academic corruption, but only as a result.

academic competitiveness in the crooked ways to become a mechanism, a complete change in the university's academic atmosphere, the reason is that participants in the low risk of being punished, to pay the cost will be reduced. In general, there are two reasons for the low probability, one implementation issue; second game, college academic evaluation system itself has problems. Academic monographs, papers comment norms, plagiarism, etc., how many colleges and universities have some penalties. Because to find, investigate and deal with some of the high cost offenders, making the provision a dead letter, rules out failure, the unspoken rules prevail. In this case, the so-called greater punishment, such as a large-scale raids to movement, is of no avail. Wang Mingming, Wang Hui, Zhu Xueqin these well-known professors of the Behind the high cost of such implementation is precisely the rules of the game out of the question. The current set of academic evaluation system, not only the implementation is difficult and costly, but also extends to more problems, addiction plagiarism, out good money